Advocates:
['S S JAYANTHI', '', 'KRISHNA PRASAD R', 'M/S KANIMOZHI MATHI CAVEATOR', '', 'S VASUKI', 'P SUBBRAMANIAM']

Crl.M.P.No.448 of 2022 in Crl.O.P.No.8854 of 2021

Crl.M.P.No.448 of 2022

in

Crl.O.P.No.8854 of 2021

S. KANNAMMAL, J.

This Petition is filed to modify the condition imposed in para (6) in the

order dated 12.05.2021 of this Court in Crl.O.P.No.8854 of 2021, as the

petitioner is an agricultural cooly and he is not able to deposit the amount.

2. It is the case of the Respondent police that the petitioner and other

accused were involved in the process of illegal manufacturing of TASMAC

liquor bottles and labels and trying to sold in the black market and hence case

was registered against them.

3. When the petitioner moved for anticipatory bail, this Court granted the

same with a condition that the petitioner has to pay a sum of Rs.25,000/-

(Rupees twenty five thousand only) in favour of “The Dean, Rajiv Gandhi

Government Hospital, Chennai” within a period of two weeks from the date of

receipt of copy of the order. But the Petitioner has not complied with the

conditions imposed. As the two w\eeks time was over, he filed a petition for

Page No:1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.M.P.No.448 of 2022 in Crl.O.P.No.8854 of 2021

extension of time and this Court also extended further two weeks' time and

imposed condition that if the petitioner failed to comply with the condition

within the time extended, the order already granted for anticipatory bail shall

stand automatically dismissed.

4. Without complying the above conditions, now, the petitioner has filed

this petition for modifying the condition, stating that he is not able to mobilize

Rs.25,000/- to pay in favour of the Dean, Rajiv Gandhi Government Hospital,

Chennai.

5. This Court has ordered Aniticipartory Bail on 12.05.2021 with a

condition that the petitioner should pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- to the Dean, Rajiv

Gandhi Government Hospital, Chennai, within a period of two weeks. As the

Petitioner has not complied with the above order, as per the request of the

learned counsel for the Petitioner, further two weeks' time was extended by this

Court on 20.01.2022. Since the Petitioner has not complied with the order for

the second time also, as per the order of this court dated 20.01.2022, the

anticipatory bail granted was automatically vacated and in view of the same,

Page No:2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.M.P.No.448 of 2022 in Crl.O.P.No.8854 of 2021

this petition has become infructuous.

6. In such a view of the matter, the anticipatory bail granted by this Court

is vacated and the petition filed to modify the condition is dismissed as

infructious. The Respondent police is directed the take necessary action to

secure the petitioner/accused for judicial remand.

15.03.2022

ggs

Page No:3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.M.P.No.448 of 2022 in Crl.O.P.No.8854 of 2021

S. KANNAMMAL, J

ggs

Crl.M.P.No.448 of 2022 in

Crl.O.P.No.8854 of 2021

15.03.2022

Page No:4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis