MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mr Justice S.S. SUNDAR
S.Syed Noushath – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, – Respondent
WP/19484/2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 01.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
W.P.No.19484 of 2017
and
W.M.P.No.21032 of 2017
S.Syed Noushath
S/o.Syed Sahibjhan
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.Tamil Nadu Wakf Board,
Rep by The Chief Executive Officer,
No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street,
Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai.1
2.The District Collector,
Villupuram District.
3.The District Revenue Officer,
Villupuram District.
4.The Tahsildar,
Tahsildar Office,
kallakurichi,
Villupuram District.
...Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the
respondents 2 to 4 from any manner interfering with the peaceful
possession and enjoyment of the petitioner wakf in Survey No.12
Sithalur Village, Kallakurichi Taluk, Villupuram District
admeasuring 17 acres and 88 cents.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.A.Nissar Ahmed
For Respondents: M/s.A.Madhumathi
Special Government Pleader
for R2 to R4
Mr.V.Raghavachari for R1
ORDER
The writ petition has been filed for issuing a Writ of
Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 2 to 4 from any manner
interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
petitioner wakf in Survey No.12 Sithalur Village, Kallakurichi
Taluk, Villupuram District.
2.In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, it
is stated that the petitioner is the Muthawalli of the Wakf
which is the owner of 17 acres and 88 cents of land in Sithalur
Village. The above writ petition is filed apprehending
interference from the respondents 2 to 4 with the peaceful
possession and enjoyment of the said property.
3.The learned counsel for the respondents Wakf Board and the
official respondents states that a school has been constructed
by the Government in a portion of the property. It is further
stated that there is a dispute with regard to tittle.
4.This Court cannot to entertain the writ petition as a
Civil Suit granting permanent injunction in favour of the
petitioner. Having regarding to the nature of pleading and the
fact that the dispute is relating to tittle and possession, it
will be appropriate to get the dispute resolved by Civil Court.
Therefore, the petitioner can approach the Civil Court and
establish his right for getting a declaration and injunction in
the manner known to law. The submission of the respondent that
the property is not a property of the wakf board and a school
has been constructed by the respondent is recorded. Subject to
the right preserved to the petitioner to approach the Civil
Court or Wakf Tribunal for getting proper relief, this writ
petition is closed. No Costs. Consequently, the connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
tta
1.The Chief Executive Officer,
Tamil Nadu Wakf Board,
No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street,
Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai.1
2.The District Collector,
Villupuram District.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3.The District Revenue Officer,
Villupuram District.
4.The Tahsildar,
Tahsildar Office,
kallakurichi,
Villupuram District.
+1 CC to The Government Pleader sr 5187
+1 CC to Mr.N.A.Nissar Ahmed, Advocate sr 5180.
W.P.No.19484 of 2017
PA(CO)
SP(09/03/2021)
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/