SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MANICKAM – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE REP.BY – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S G MAGESHKUMAR', '', 'K S RAJU', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Wednesday, the Twenty Second day of September Two Thousand Twenty One

PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.17045 of 2021

MANICKAM

[ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]

Vs

THE STATE REP.BY

[ RESPONDENT ]

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

SRIPERUMBUDUR ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,

KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.

CR.NO.6/2021.

For Petitioner : M/S. G.MAGESHKUMAR Advocate

For Respondent : MR. C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the

respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 67

Information Technology Act r/w Sec.12 of POCSO Act, in Crime No.6 of

2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had sent

his half nude photo to the school group and he was chatting with his

girl friend and exchanged photos between ourselves, inadvertently he

sent a photo to a school group. Hence, the complaint was g

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top