SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
RAMESH VENKAT – Appellant
Versus
T.VENKATESA RAJA – Respondent


1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 04.04.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

E.P.No. 57 of 2006

in

C.S.No. 810 of 1996

Ramesh Venkat

rep. By Power of Attorney Holder,

Smt.Subbulakshmi

...Petitioner/Decree

Holder

Vs.

1.Narashimhan and others

...Respondents/JD s

2.K.T.Venkatesa Raja

3.K.T.Srinivasa Raja

...Third parties/Obstructors

Prayer: The execution petition filed under Order XIV Rule 10 of O.S.Rules r/w

Order XXI Rule 35 & 36 of Civil Procedure Code praying to order delivery of

possession forthwith from the hands of the Obstructors to the petitioner/Decree

Holder.

For Petitioner/DH

: Mr.G.V.Subramaniam

For Respondents/JD s : Mr.K.Ramu

ORDER

This execution petition has been filed seeking delivery of possession

pursuant to a decree in C.S.No. 810 of 1996.

2. The short facts that led the Master directing the execution petition to

be posted before the Court are as follows:

2

The decree holder claims to have entered into an agreement of sale on

22.06.1995 with one S.Narasimhan to purchase the property in question for a

total sale consideration of Rs.19,00,000/- and has paid an advance of

Rs.80,000/-.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top