1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 26.07.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

C.S.No. 104 of 2014

and

O.A.No. 199 of 2014

M.S.Moorthy

..Plaintiff

Vs.

K.Saravanan

...Defendant

Prayer: Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules, 1956, r/w

Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C. praying to direct the defendant to pay the sum of

Rs.3,91,90,000/- along with interest at 18% per annum on Rs.3,40,00,000/-

from the date of plaint to the date of realization and for costs of the suit.

For Plaintiff

: Mr.B.Balachander

For Defendant

: Defendant set exparte on 12.07.2019

O R D E R

This suit is one for recovery of a sum of Rs.3,91,90,000/- with interest at

18% per annum at Rs.3,40,000/- on date of claim till date of realization.

2. According to the plaintiff, the defendants had borrowed a sum of

Rs.1,60,00,000/- on 20.07.2012. As a security for the due repayment of the said

http://www.judis.nic.in

2

sum, the defendant had executed a promisory note acknowledging the liability

and agreeing to repay the same with interest at 18%. Again, during September

2012, the defendant sought for further financial assistance from the plaintiff and

the plaintiff advanced a further sum of Rs.1,18,00,000/- to the defendant on

24.09.2012. On the same day, the defendant executed an affidavit in a 20 rupee

non-judicial stamp paper agreeing to repay the sum of Rs.3,40,00,000/- with

interest at 18% within a period of six months. According to the plaintiff, despite

demand, the defendant did not come forward to pay the money and hence, the

plaintiff is forced to file the above suit.

3. Pending the suit, the matter was referred to Mediation. At the time of

Mediation, the defendant has paid a sum of Rs.1,00,00,000/-(Ruppes One Crore

only) on 14.09.2015 but as the mediation failed, the matter was referred back to

the Court. Since the defendant did not file written statement, the defendant was

called absent set exparte on 12.07.2019 and the matter was posted for recording

exparte evidence before the learned Master. The plaintiff has been examined as

P.W.1. He has filed a proof affidavit reiterating the averments contained in the

plaint. He has also produced the promisory note as Ex.P1 and the affidavit as

Ex.P2. The suit notice with returned covers has been marked as Ex.P3.

http://www.judis.nic.in

3

4. Considering the evidence on record, I find that the plaintiff has proved

the lending and is entitled to a decree in the suit. Hence, the suit is decreed

directing the defendant to pay a sum of Rs.3,91,90,000/- (Rupees Three Crores

Ninety One Lakhs Ninety Thousand only) with interest at 9% per annum from

the date of plaint till date of decree and thereafter, at 6% per annum till date of

realization. The sum of Rs.1,00,00,000/- (One Crore only) paid during

mediation shall be adjusted towards interest payable as on that date. The

plaintiff will be entitled to costs of the suit also.

26.07.2019

kkn

List of Witness on the side of the Plaintiff:-

M.S.Moorthy (P.W.1)

List of Evidences on the side of the Plaintiff :-

1. Ex.P1 - Promisory Note dated 20.07.2012

2. Ex.P2 - Affidavit dated 24.09.2012

3. Ex.P3 – Returned cover which contains counsel notice with

acknowledgement dated 18.06.2013.

26.07.2019

http://www.judis.nic.in

4

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

kkn

C.S.No. 104 of 2014

and

O.A.No. 199 of 2014

26.07.2019

http://www.judis.nic.in