SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
L.SUNDARAMEENATCHI @ AARTHY – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP.BY – Respondent
CRL OP 135/2019



Advocates:
['M/S R SANKARASUBBU', '', 'A RAMESH', 'S JEEVANANTHAM']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.01.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

Crl.O.P.No.135 of 2019

L.Sundarameenatchi @ Aarthy ...Petitioner

Vs.

State rep. By:

1.The Commissioner of Police,

Vepery,

Chennai-7.

2.The Inspector of Police

T1 – Police station

Ambattur

Chennai.

3. Manikandan

...Respondents

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of

the Cr.P.C., to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to execute

the warrant in Crl.MP.No.2806 of 2017 in M.C.No.08 of 2016 on

the file of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thoothukudi and produce

the said Manikandan S/o.S.Murugan before the court Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Thoothukudi to secure the ends.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu

For R1 & R2

: Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz

Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This petition has been filed seeking for a direction

to the 2nd respondent to execute the warrant, which has been

issued on 03.05.2018 in Crl.M.P.No. 2806 of 2017 in M.C.No.08

of 2016, on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Thoothukudi.

2

The petitioner has filed maintenance case

before the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thoothukudi. Since

the 3rd respondent did not appear before the Court, a warrant

of arrest was issued by the Court below with a direction to

the 2nd respondent to produce the 3rd respondent. This warrant

has not been executed till date. In the mean time, the 3rd

respondent had also left to a Foreign Country. Left with no

other option the petitioner has moved this Court seeking for a

direction to the 2nd respondent to execute the warrant.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3

In the facts and circumstances of the case,

there shall be direction to the 2nd respondent to execute the

warrant of arrest dated 03.05.2018 by taking appropriate steps

to secure the 3rd respondent and produce him before the Court

within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a

copy of this order.

4

This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of

with the above directions.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar(j)

//True Copy//

Sub Assistant Registrar

mpa/rpl

To

1.The Commissioner of Police

Vepery

Chennai-7.

2.The Inspector of Police

T1 – Police station

Ambattur

Chennai.

3.The Public Prosecutor,

High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.R.Sankarasubbu , Advocate SR.No. 1503

Crl.O.P.No.135 of 2019

A.SK(23/01/2019)

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top