C.CLUNYLEELA – Appellant
Versus
S.P.MARY JOHN – Respondent
TR CMP 914/2018
['M/S GURUPRASAD M', '', 'S YOGALAKSHMI', 'R LAVANYA', 'NOTICE SENT TO SOLE RESPDT', '', 'NOT READY NOTICE REG SOLE RESPDT', 'PRIVATE NOTICE', '', 'S P MARY JOHN', 'S/O C S PANEERSELVAM']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.01.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN
Tr.C.M.P.No.914 of 2018
and
C.M.P.Nos.22430 & 22432 of 2018
C.Clunyleela
...Petitioner
..Vs..
S.P.Mary John
...Respondent
Prayer: Petition is filed under Section 24 of C.P.C., to
withdraw I.D.O.P.No.4 of 2018 pending on the file of the
Principal District Court, Karur and transfer the same to the
file of the Principal District Court, Salem.
For Petitioner
:
Mr.S.Arun Prasath
for Mr.M.Guruprasad
For Respondent
:
No Appearance
O R D E R
This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been
filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure to
withdraw the case i.e. I.D.O.P.No.4 of 2018 pending on the file
of the Principal District Court, Karur and transfer the same to
the file of the Principal District Court, Salem.
2. The petitioner is the wife and respondent is the
husband. The marriage between the petitioner and respondent was
solemnized on 08.05.2017 at C.S.I. Holy Trinity Church, Salem,
as per Christian religion rites and customs. After the marriage,
both the petitioner and respondent were lived together in the
matrimonial home for a considerable period. Due to the wedlock,
on 02.04.2018, the petitioner gave birth to one male child and
as of now, the said child is in the custody of the petitioner.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
After gave birth to the said male child, difference of opinion
arose between them, resultantly, the petitioner left the
matrimonial home and residing along with her parents at Salem.
3. After leaving the matrimonial home by the
petitioner, the respondent has filed a petition against the
petitioner before the Principal District Court, Karur, under
Section 10(x) of Indian Divorce Act, 1869, for the relief of
annulling the marriage happened between them on 08.05.2017. The
said petition is now pending before the Principal District
Court, Karur as I.D.O.P.No.4 of 2018. In the said circumstances,
the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing the
present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition for the relief
stated earlier in the first paragraph of this order.
4. According to the petitioner, she is residing at
Salem along with her parents and the distance between her
parents residence and Karur is about 100 kilometers, being a
lady, it is very difficult for her to attend the Court
proceedings at Karur, along with the minor child, who is aged
about 9 months. Further, she is not having any independent
income and she is depending on her parents for her day-to-day
needs and for litigation expenses.
5. In respect to the respondent, he was served with
Court notice as early as on 21.01.2019 and his name is printed
in the cause list, thereafter till today, he has not appeared
before this Court either in person or through counsel. It shows
that the respondent is not having any objection in respect to
this petition.
6. In the said circumstances, as per the affidavit
filed by the petitioner, as of now, she is residing with her
parents in Salem without any independent income, she has
specifically stated that, she is depending on her parents for
her day-to-day needs. Further, being a lady, it is very
difficult for her to attend the Court proceedings at Karur.
7. It is well settled law that whenever, the transfer
petition is filed in matrimonial disputes, the convenience of
the wife shall be given preference, as held by our Honourable
Apex Court in the judgments in Arti Rani @ Pinki Devi and
another Vs. Dharmendra Kumar Gupta reported in 2008 (9) SCC 353
and in Sumita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay and another reported in AIR
2002 SC 396.
8. Apart from that, for raising objection in respect to
the allegations levelled by the petitioner against the
respondent, the respondent has not appeared before this Court,
furthe