SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

M.N.Shantharam – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/s A Jenasenan', '', 'ABISHEK JENASENAN', 'ARUN DHANAPALAN']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 26.04.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN

W.P.No.12332 of 2019 and

W.M.P.Nos.12629 & 12631 of 2019

M.N.Santharam

... Petitioner

Versus

1.Union of India,

Rep. By Secretary to Government of India,

Ministry of Labour and Employment,

Shram Shakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg,

New Delhi 110 001.

2.Central Provident Fund Commissioner,

Employees Provident Fund Organisation,

Ministry of Labour & Employment,

Govt. Of India, Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan,

14, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066.

3.Addl.Central Provident Fund Commissioner, HQ (Pension)

Employees Provident Fund Organization,

Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan,

14, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066.

4.Regional Provident Fund Commissioner – I (Pension),

Employees Provident Fund Organisation,

Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan,

14, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066.

5.Addl.Central Provident Fund Commissioner,

Employees Provident Fund Organisation,

37, Royapettah High Road,

Chennai 600 014.

6.Regional Provident Fund Commissioner,

Employees Provident Fund Organization,

37, Royapettah High Road,

Chennai 600 014.

7.The Chairman & Managing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top