MADRAS HIGH COURT
M/s.CSG Holding Company – Appellant
Versus
Saint Gobain Glass France – Respondent
A 5616 2016
A.Nos.5616, 5617, 5618 of 2016,364 of 2018 and
5012 of 2019 in C.S.No.754 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Reserved on
Delivered on
18.10.2019
11.12.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
A.Nos.5616, 5617, 5618 of 2016,
364 of 2018 and 5012 of 2019
in C.S.No.754 of 2012
C O M M O N O R D E R
Application Nos.5616, 5617 and 5618 of 2016 are filed to
condone delay of 1297 days in filing the applications to set aside the
exparte order dated 7.1.2013 in O.A.Nos.980, 981 and 982 of 2012
respectively in C.S.No.754 of 2012.
2. Application Nos.364 of 2018 and 5012 of 2019 are filed to
vacate the exparte injunction order dated passed in O.A.982 of 2012
and O.A.980 of 2012 respectively in C.S.No.754 of 2012.
3. The above applications are filed mainly on the ground that
notice has not been properly served as per the Civil Procedure Code.
1/30
http://www.judis.nic.in
A.Nos.5616, 5617, 5618 of 2016,364 of 2018 and
5012 of 2019 in C.S.No.754 of 2012
Therefore, ex-parte order passed by this Court has to be vacated and
the interim injunction applications to be heard afresh.
4. Since the learned Senior Counsel Mr.P.S.Raman has submitted
that the injunction application itself can be disposed afresh, this Court
is of the view that instead of going to the merits whether notice has
been served or not, is inclined to hear the injunction application afresh.
Accordingly exparte order passed by this Court is set aside and
injunction application O.A.980 and 981 of 2012 heard fresh. Both
counsels have advanced their arguments in the above applications.
O.A.No.980 and 981 of 2012 in C.S.No.754 of 2014
5. Suit in C.S.No.754 of 2014 and has been filed for infringement
and passing off the plaintiff registered trade mark SGG and/or the
Triangular Bridge Device filed as Plaint document. It is stated in the
plaint that the 1st Plaintiff is the world leader in the habitat and
construction markets, designing, manufacturing and distributing
building materials, and providing innovative solutions to meet growing
2/30
http://www.judis.nic.in
A.Nos.5616, 5617, 5618 of 2016,364 of 2018 and
5012 of 2019 in C.S.No.754 of 2012
demand in emerging economies. The Plaintiffs group is one of the top
100 industrial groups in the world. The Saint Gobain Group of which
the Plaintiffs are a part, was established in the year 1665 and is a
pioneer in the manufacture of glass, glasswares and mirrors under the
name Saint-Gobain. The Saint Gobain had the privilege of supplying
357 mirrors for the Hall of Mirrors in the palace of Versailles in 1684.
The First Plaintiff began exporting its products, in particular glass, to
other countries in 1856, and established its first foreign plaint in 1937.
Second Plaintiff is a limited liability company. The Plaintiffs group
operates in about 64 countries. They enjoy immense reputation and
goodwill in India, and the general and trading public exclusively
associate the mark "SGG" being the abbreviation of the Saint Gobain
Glass, with the Plaintiff group.
6. Ever since the year 2000, the Plaintiff have been
manufacturing and marketing amongst other products, various types
of glass including flat glass, solar reflective glasses, mirror glass,
magnetron coated glass etc., The Plaintiff have, from the inception,
3/30
http://www.judis.nic.in
A.Nos.5616, 5617, 5618 of 2016,364 of 2018 and
5012 of 2019 in C.S.No.754 of 2012
used an artistic work as its corporate trade mark/logo, being an artistic
representation of the name/trademark 'saint gobain' under a triangular
device in a new, original and unique manner. The Second Plaintiff
applied for and has obtained registrations in respect of goods
contained in classes 19 and 20 and obtained the following
registrations:
S.No.
Appl.No.
Trademark
Class
1
1132951
SGG
19
2
1132952
SAINT GOBAIN LOGO
20
3
1132953
SAINT GOBAI