Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
S. SAMUEL PARAYAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF TAMIL NADU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petition became infructuous due to subsequent events. (Para 1 , 2) |
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent events, nothing survives for consideration in this petition and the petition may be disposed of.
2. Placing on record the said statement, this writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. There will be no order as to costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
