IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
A.Mariappan – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary Government of India Ministry of Home Affairs – Respondent
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 08.06.2015, passed by the sixth respondent and the consequential impugned order dated 28.05.2021, passed by the fourth respondent, dismissing the petitioner from service.
2. The petitioner was working with the Central Reserve Police Force as a Police Constable. On account of his unauthorized absence for a period of 270 days, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him. An Enquiry Officer was appointed in the disciplinary proceedings. In the enquiry proceedings, despite receipt of notice, the petitioner chose not to attend the enquiry proceedings. The Enquiry Officer submitted the enquiry report and in the enquiry report, the Enquiry Officer has held that the petitioner is guilty of the charges framed against him, namely, unauthorized absence for a period of 270 days. Based on the enquiry report, the Disciplinary Authority, namely, sixth respondent passed the impugned order dated 08.06.2015 imposing the punishment of dismissing the petitioner from service. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the fifth respondent and the same was also rejected by the fifth respondent throug
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.