Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
A.Mariappan – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary Government of India Ministry of Home Affairs – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge of dismissal due to unauthorized absence. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on severity of punishment and regulations of crpf act. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. clarification of crpf sections related to disciplinary proceedings. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. judicial review limitations on quasi-judicial disciplinary decisions. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. final ruling dismissing the writ petition. (Para 15) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 08.06.2015, passed by the sixth respondent and the consequential impugned order dated 28.05.2021, passed by the fourth respondent, dismissing the petitioner from service.
2. The petitioner was working with the Central Reserve Police Force as a Police Constable. On account of his unauthorized absence for a period of 270 days, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him. An Enquiry Officer was appointed in the disciplinary proceedings. In the enquiry proceedings, despite receipt of notice, the petitioner chose not to attend the enquiry proceedings. The Enquiry Officer submitted the enquiry report and in the enquiry report, the Enquiry Officer has held that the petitioner is guilty of the charges fra
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
