Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 63090
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.Senthilkumar, J
Raj Television Network Limited – Appellant
Versus
Kangeyam Chellamuthu Prakash – Respondent
C.S(COMM DIV) No. 90 of 2025 | OA.No.336 of 2025
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Dhanush for M/s.Vijayan Subramanian
For the Respondents: Mr.G.Balasubramanian for M/s.Leela And Co. for D2
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Dhanush for M/s.Vijayan Subramanian
For the Respondents: Mr.G.Balasubramanian for M/s.Leela And Co. for D2
The court affirmed closure of proceedings due to compliance with copyright issues, ensuring no costs are imposed.
Headnote:This judgment analyzes proceedings under Order IV Rule 1 OS Rules r/w Order VII Rule 1 of CPC and Sections 55 and 62 of the Copyright Act, 1957. The plaintiff sought injunctions against the defendants for copyright infringement and mandatory injunctions for account statements. The court noted that content was blocked and concluded by closing the civil suit without costs. The final ruling was that the civil suit is closed with no costs.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. compliance with copyright content blocking. (Para 1) |
| 2. closure of civil suit. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the 2nd defendant submits that the content is being blocked by the 2nd defendant in their platform and it has been confirmed by the learned counsel for the plaintiff. A memo has also been filed by the 2nd defendant to that effect and the same is recorded.
2. Recording the above Memo filed by the 2nd defendant, this Civil Suit is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected application is also closed.
