Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VADAMALAI, J
D.Ravichandran – Appellant
Versus
G.N.Baskaran – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant challenged the validity of the sale deed based on a forged power of attorney. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. plaintiffs established ownership and alleged fraud in property documents. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. lower courts maintained suit validity; key issues regarding limitation and parties addressed. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. emphasis on burden of proof on defendants to validate documents claimed to be forged. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. high court upheld the lower courts' findings; appeal dismissed. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 24.09.2013 passed in A.S.No.210 of 2011 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Madurai (Melur camp), confirming the judgment and decree, dated 10.12.2010 and amended decree, dated 12.10.2011, passed in O.S.No.124 of 2006 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Melur.
2. The appellant is the first defendant and the respondents 1 and 2 are the plaintiffs and the second respondent is the second defendant in O.S.No.124 of 2006 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Melur.
3. The respondents 1 and 2/plaintiffs filed the suit for declaration that the power of attorney deed, dated 03.10.2002 in fav
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
