IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J
D. Karunakaran – Appellant
Versus
K. Padmanathan – Respondent
Appeal Suit No.806 of 2019
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of case details and property ownership (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defendant's claims against plaintiff's entitlement (Para 3) |
| 3. defenses presented by the defendants (Para 4) |
| 4. judicial proceedings and court's initial findings (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. detailed examination of the evidence presented (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. legal citations argue against plaintiff's rights (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. defendant's arguments and challenges to ownership (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. counterclaims and evidence from the defendants (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 9. assessment of the trial court's judgment (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 10. observations on the credibility of the evidence (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 11. judicial interpretation of property rights (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 12. discussion on property transfers and preemption rights (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 13. ratio decidendi regarding the sale deed's validity (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 14. final decision and implications of the judgment (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
JUDGMENT
This Appeal Suit had been filed against the judgment and decree dated 31.01.2019 made in O.S.No.10824 of 2010 on the file of the learned VI Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
2. The brief facts which are necessary for the disposal of this Appeal Suit are as follows:-
2.1. The 1st Defendant is the elder brother of the Plaintiff. One Mr.N.Kanniah Reddy was the father of the Plaintiff and the 1st Defendant. The said Mr.N.Kanniah Reddy was the owner of the premises bearing new No.17, Old No.9, Sampangi Street (formerly known as 4-B, Ramanujulu Reddy Street) West Mambalam, Chennai 600 033, more fully described in the ‘A’ schedule by virtue of sale deed dated 17.2.1968 executed by one T.K.Govindaraj Reddiar in his favour vide registered document No.495/68 within S.R.O. Thyagaraya Nagar and District Registrar, Madras South. The Plaintiff’s father purchased a vacant site in the above mentioned property and put up brick walls laid with asbestos roof and obtained water, sewerage and drainage connection to the above said property and he has been in possession and enjoyment of the same. With sound disposing state of mind and out of free will and volition, the deceased Mr.N.Kanniah Reddy executed a registered settlement deed dated 20.11.1971 in document No.1707/1971 within SRO, Thiyagaraya Nagar, settling the life estate in the plaint ‘A’ schedule property to his wife Dhanabackiyammal and divested the vested remainder to his sons namely the Plaintiff and the first Defendant with all the powers of alienation and also delivered possession of the plaint ‘A’ schedule property to his wife Dhanabackiyammal. The Plaintiff’s mother seized the said property and she had been dealing with the property. The records in the Corporation and Chennai Metro Water Sewerage and Drainage connection were mutated in the name of the deceased Dhanabackiyammal for the payment of property tax and water tax. The Plaintiff’s father N.Kanniah Reddy died on 5.3.1982 and his mother Dhanabackiyammal died on 3.5.1994. After the death of their parents, the Plaintiff and the first Defendant were in joint possession of the plaint ‘A’ schedule property. The Plaintiff’s father met with an accident and sustained multiple fractures on right thigh and was hospitalized in Royapettah Hospital for nearly one year and the Plaintiff bestowed his personal care and met out the entire medical expenses of his father apart from his performing obsequies of his father and the sixteenth day ceremony at his own cost. The Plaintiff’s mother was hospitalized in Vijaya Hospital for three months. The first Defendant did not attend the funeral of his parents even and such is the attitude of the first Defendant.
2.2. In the year 1996, the Plaintiff obtained planning permit, approval of the building plan from the Corporation of Chennai and put up superstructure on the remaining vacant site in the plaint ‘A’ schedule property out of his own funds and earnings
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.