SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 63332

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J
Ramasamy – Appellant
Versus
K.Rangasamy – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.N.Manokaran
For the Respondents: Mr.V.S.Kesavan

JUDGMENT

This Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 19.07.2011 made in A.S.No.92 of 2010 on the file of the learned I Additional Sub Court, Erode reversal of the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2010 made in O.S.No.40 of 2008 on the file of the learned I Additional District Munsif Court, Erode.

2. The learned Counsel for the Appellants Mr.N.Manokaran submitted that the Appellants herein were the Defendants in the Suit in O.S.No.40 of 2008 on the file of the learned I Additional District Munsif, Erode. The Suit property originally belonged to the paternal grandfather of the Plaintiffs viz., Nallamuthu Gounder . Nallamuthu Gounder had two sons viz., Kulanthaisamy and Muthusamy. The said Kulanthaisamy had two sons viz., Rangasamy and Chidambaram/Plaintiffs. The Plaintiffs' paternal grandfather died intestate. The suit properties are the ancestral properties of the Plaintiffs. The Plaintiffs' paternal uncle viz., Muthusamy Gounder had two daughters viz., Subbulakshmi and Kasthuri. They had sold the property to Ramasamy and Periyasamy. The sale deeds were marked during trial as Ex.B-2 and Ex.B-3, dated 08.08.1991.

3. It is the contention of the Defendants bef

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top