Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B. Balaji, J
Maddimsetti Brunda Venni – Appellant
Versus
Bhavanarushi Temple Trust – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the revision petition is dismissed due to procedural shortcomings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. neglect in the prosecution of the suit leads to dismissal. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. procedural rules of cpc apply to different applications. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. insufficient cause for delay does not warrant condonation. (Para 10 , 14) |
ORDER
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the revision petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 361 days in preferring the revision petition, challenging the order in I.A.No.57 of 2022 in I.A.No.319 of 2016 in O.S.No.98 of 2015 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Yanam.
2.Heard Mrs.D.E.Anisree Sangavi, for Mr.Usha Ramman, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.V.Moorthi, learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.V.Vasanthakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader (Puducherry) for the 3rd respondent.
3.The revision petitioner is the plaintiff. The revision petitioner filed O.S.No.98 of 2015 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Yanam, for declaration of title and permanent injunction. The defendants in the suit entered appearance and also filed their written statement. Trial commenced on 08.06.2016 and as the suit was posted in the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
