SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 63584

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sunder Mohan, J
Jackson Duraimani, Nelson, Sam, Isravel, Vincent Robin, Santhanaraj, Stephen – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rural Division, Pudukottai, Thoothukudi District. – Respondent
CRL OP(MD). No.18304 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Selvakumar P
For the Respondents: Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Mr.Manokumar

Bail consideration under SC/ST Act requires hearing the victim's objections despite petitioners' immediate needs for bail post-surrender.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The petition invokes Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, requesting bail considerations under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Facts of the Case: The petitioners sought immediate bail upon surrender related to Crime No.446 of 2025.

Findings of Court:
The court emphasizes adherence to Section 18 of the Act while granting bail considerations.

Issues: The court frames the essential inquiry regarding the applicability of bail provisions in the face of statutory restrictions.

Ratio Decidendi: Citing Section 18, the court insists a hearing must be afforded to the victim and highlights previous antecendents of petitioners.

Result: The petitioners shall surrender before the concerned jurisdictional Court within a period of fifteen days.

Table of Content
1. bail request based on surrender and statutory requirements. (Para 1 , 2)
2. importance of victim's hearing in bail proceedings. (Para 3)
3. scheduled time for surrender communicated. (Para 4)

ORDER

The petitioners seek a direction to the Special Court for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 , Thoothukudi to pass order on their bail petition on the same day of surrender in Crime No.446 of 2025 on the file of the second respondent police.

2. The learned counsel representing the third respondent/defacto complainant opposed the prayer of these petitioners.

3. In view of the specific bar under Section 18 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and also taking into consideration of the facts of the case, there shall be a direction to the Special Court for , Thoothukudi to consider the petitioners' bail application on the same day of their surrender in connection with Crime No.446 of 2025 registered for the offences under Section 3(5), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 351(3) of BNS, 2023, Section 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. It is needless to say that the Court below while disposing the bail petition shall consider the gravity of the offence, previous antecedent of the petitioners and pass orders, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the victim under Section 15-A of the SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989. It is needless to say that the Court below may hear the objections of the victim at the time of hearing of bail application filed by the petitioners.

4. The petitioners shall surrender before the concerned jurisdictional Court, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioners shall inform in advance the learned Public Prosecutor and the victim of the date of surrender and of the filing of the petition.

5. This Criminal Original Petition is ordered accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top