Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Sunder Mohan, J
Jackson Duraimani, Nelson, Sam, Isravel, Vincent Robin, Santhanaraj, Stephen – Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rural Division, Pudukottai, Thoothukudi District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail request based on surrender and statutory requirements. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. importance of victim's hearing in bail proceedings. (Para 3) |
| 3. scheduled time for surrender communicated. (Para 4) |
ORDER
The petitioners seek a direction to the Special Court for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 , Thoothukudi to pass order on their bail petition on the same day of surrender in Crime No.446 of 2025 on the file of the second respondent police.
2. The learned counsel representing the third respondent/defacto complainant opposed the prayer of these petitioners.
3. In view of the specific bar under Section 18 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and also taking into consideration of the facts of the case, there shall be a direction to the Special Court for , Thoothukudi to consider the petitioners' bail application on the same day of their surrender in connection with Crime No.446 of 2025 registered for the offences under Section 3(5), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 351(3) of BNS, 2023, Section 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
