Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.Murali Shankar, J
P.Kulanthaisamy – Appellant
Versus
K.Murugan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial case overview and basis for the complaint. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the nature of the cheque and its enforceability. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. legal principles surrounding public policy and void contracts. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. final determination on the appeal's merits and dismissal. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
JUDGMENT
The Criminal Appeal is directed against the judgment made in C.C.No.32 of 2017 dated 04.01.2018 on the file of the Fast Track Magistrate Court, Srivilliputtur, acquitting the respondent for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments (hereinafter referred as 'NI') Act.
2. The appellant / complainant filed a private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. against the first respondent / accused for the alleged offence under Section 138 r/w 142 of the NI Act.
3. For the sake of convenience and brevity, the parties herein after will be referred to as per their status / ranking in the trial Court.
4. The case of the complainant is that the accused was earlier working in mechanical section of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred as 'TNSTC') depot at Virudhunagar and the complainant had acquaintance with
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
