Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Anita Sumanth, C.Kumarappan, JJ
C.Lazer – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks court intervention against illegal bar operation. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. respondents challenge the maintainability of the writ petition. (Para 3 , 7) |
| 3. court discusses the legality of the bar's location concerning rules. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. assessment of rules regarding the bar's compliance with distance from worship. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. rules intended to maintain decorum near religious establishments. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. court orders closure of bar based on violations found. (Para 24) |
(Order of the Court was made by Dr.Anita Sumanth J.)
The petitioner seeks a Mandamus directing R1 to R5 to take appropriate action against R6 for running an illegal and unauthorized Tasmac Bar attached to Tasmac Shop No.4860 in Door No.11-13E, Eraniel Village, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District (Tasmac shop/shop in question).
2.At the outset, and as a preliminary objection, Mr.Veera Kathiravan, learned Additional Advocate General, for Mr.S.Sivanesan, appearing for respondents 3 and 4, assails the maintainability of this Writ Petition on the ground that the petitioner is not a resident in the immediate vicinity of the shop and hence,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
