Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
H.Sultan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government Home (Court-IIA) Department Ft. St.George, Chennai-9. – Respondent
12.B.Kaleswari ...Respondents PRAYER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Declaration, declaring that the order dated 27.11.2009 passed by the 3rd respondent for attachment of the petitioner's property under Ex.P 100 to 104 in O.A.14/2009 in C.C.53/2008 and the consequential attachment dated 01.03.2010 by the respondent is illegal, unconstitutional, non-est in law in so far as the petitioner's property is concerned.
For Petitioner : Mr.Palani Selvaraj For R1 & R2 : Mrs.S.Anitha Special Government Pleader For R4 & R5 : Mr.Guruprasad For R3, R6 & R8 : No Appearance For R7, R9 & R10 : Not ready in notice
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed, to issue a Writ of Declaration, declaring that the order dated 27.11.2009 passed by the 3rd respondent for attachment of the petitioner's property under Ex.P 100 to 104 in O.A.14/2009 in C.C.53/2008 and the consequential attachment dated 01.03.2010 by the respondent is illegal, unconstitutional, non-est in law in so far as the petitioner's property is concerned.
2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is a business man and he availed a loan of Rs.5,00,000/- from the 4th respond
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
