IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
The Inspector of Police, Senthurai Police Station Ariyalur. – Appellant
Versus
Anbu Rose – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties resolved conflict, rendering cases unnecessary. (Para 2) |
| 2. court exercises discretion under section 482 to quash cases. (Para 3) |
C OMMON O RDER
This is a common order passed in two C.C.'s in C.C.No.85 of 2020 and C.C.No.34 of 2021.
2.The background of the case seems to be that the parties were residing in opposite houses. While so, a conflict arose on account of the conduct of the one person's son with the other person's daughter. Now, the conflict is no more there. The defacto-complainant in one case insisted that unless the other party apologise to them, she will not settle. The other side also apologised to the defacto-complainant. In view of the fact that the parties have moved on and the problem is no more in existence, since, the girl has got married and she is living in separate place and even the mother of the one of the accused is going to shift the house also, there is no point in continuing both the cases.
3.In view of the same, recording the compromise between the parties, I am of the view that, this is a fit case for exercise of power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., as per the dictum of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh Vs. State of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.