IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.S.RAMESH, R.SAKTHIVEL, JJ
R.Banumathi – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Educational Officer, Vellore District, Vellore Collectorate Office, Tamil Nadu – Respondent
Writ Appeal | W.A.NO.2014 OF 2021 | CMP NO.12887 OF 2021 | W.P. No.12565 of 2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition for pension benefits of deceased employee. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding entitlement to pension and benefits. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of cps and nomination rights. (Para 8 , 10) |
| 4. substantive rights of nominee versus estate of deceased. (Para 31 , 35) |
| 5. final order on distribution of compensation and benefits. (Para 48 , 49) |
JUDGMENT
R.SAKTHIVEL, J.
The appellant filed the writ petition in W.P. No.12565 of 2021 on April 26, 2021, praying this Court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to issue a separate and individual cheque / demand draft for her 1/3 share in Contributory Pension Scheme (CPS), Employees Family Security Fund and other service benefits of her son - late S.Vijayakumar, who had joined the service on December 9, 2005 and was working as a Secondary Grade Teacher in Panchayat Union Elementary School [P.U.E. School], Chitteri before his demise on January 30, 2021.
2. Upon hearing either side, the learned Single Judge of this Court dismissed the writ petition vide Order dated June 10, 2021. The main reasons for the dismissal are captured in Paragraph Nos.3 and 5 of the said Order and they read thus:
"3. Under the Pension Schemes/Rules, the spouse of the Government employee is entitled to get family pension. As far as the terminal benefits are concerned, if there is any specific nomination in the service records of the Government employee, then the nominee is entitled to receive the same. In the absence of any nomination, the benefit is sought to be settled in favour of the spouse. In the present case, the wife of the deceased employee is entitled for pensionary benefits and for family pension under the Pension Scheme. As far as the parents of the deceased employee is concerned, even in case they are not having other sources of income, they are entitled to approach the competent authorities under the provisions of the Senior Citizen Act for redressal of their grievances. Contrarily, the family pension or pensionary benefits cannot be settled in violation of the Pension Rules/Pension Schemes.
… … … … …
5. The petitioner is unable to establish any right with reference to the Pension Scheme/Rules. In the absence of Rules, the family pension or pensionary benefits cannot be shared between the legal heirs. The right of property to the legal heirs of a deceased employee is no way connected with the Pension Scheme and payment of family pension to the spouse of the deceased employee. The petitioner as the mother of a deceased employee may have legal right in the property. However, she cannot claim the benefit of family pension or to seek the relief of sharing the family pension which is to be paid to the spouse of the deceased employee as per the Pension Rules."
3. Feeling aggrieved by the dismissal Order dated June 10, 2021 passed in W.P. No.12565 of 2021, the writ petitioner therein has preferred this writ appeal.
4. For the sake of convenience, hereinafter, the parties will be referred to as per their rank in the writ petition.
5. The submissions of Mr.Maheswaran Prabakaran for Mr. M.A. Gowthaman, learned Counsel on record for the appellant / writ petitioner can be summarised as follows:
(i) Writ petitioner is the mother of late S.Vijayakumar. Fourth respondent is his wife and the fifth respondent is his daughter.
(ii) Said late S.Vijayakumar was working as a Secondary Grade Teacher in Panchayat Union Elementary School [P.U.E. School], Chitteri. He joined the service on December 9, 2005.
(iii) The fifth respondent is a baby born to the couple through In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) method, who is now 8 years old. The fourth respondent humiliated and caused severe mental agonies to the deceased son of the writ petitioner due to which, he committed suicide on January 30, 2021.
(iv) The suicide prompted the writ petitioner to file a complaint against the fourth respondent and an First Information Report (FIR) under Section 174 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 ( IPC ) was register
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.