SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 78312

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
RAJAVEL – Appellant
Versus
MUTHUSAMY – Respondent
W.A. No.3204 of 2025|C.M.P. No.26131 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.Govi Ganesan
For the Respondents: J.Ganesh, R.Thirumoorthy, Vadivelu Deenadayalan

The Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 does not apply to private patta lands; boundary disputes between private individuals must be resolved by civil courts, not by survey officers.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 (Tamil Nadu Act No.VIII of 1923) - Sections 5, 9, 10, 14, 17, 21 - Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act, 1983 (Tamil Nadu Act 4 of 1986) - Scope of survey under the Act - Application for survey of private patta lands is not maintainable - Boundary disputes between private individuals must be resolved by civil courts - Survey officers have no power to determine civil rights or fix boundaries in respect of private lands. (Paras 5-16)

(B) Civil Procedure - Suppression of facts - A party obtaining an order by suppressing the fact that a civil suit and appeal had been dismissed is disentitled to relief - Writ court's order set aside on that ground as well. (Paras 2-3)

Facts of the case:
The first respondent had filed a civil suit (O.S.No.135 of 2020) which was dismissed, and the appeal (A.S.No.20 of 2021) was also dismissed. The appellants were parties to those proceedings. Without disclosing these facts, the first respondent filed a writ petition seeking a direction to survey and fix boundaries of the subject property. The writ court allowed the petition and directed the authorities to complete the survey within six weeks. The appellants, being third parties, obtained leave and filed the present intra-court appeal.

Findings of Court:
The court held that an application for survey and fixation of boundaries under the Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 is not maintainable in respect of private patta lands. The Act deals with survey of Government lands (Chapter II) and estates (Chapter III), and does not empower survey officers to resolve boundary disputes between private individuals. The final arbitrator for such disputes is the civil court. Further, the first respondent had suppressed the dismissal of the civil suit and appeal, which vitiated the writ order.

Issues: Whether an application under the Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 for survey and fixation of boundaries of private patta lands is maintainable; and whether the writ order obtained by suppressing material facts can stand.

Ratio Decidendi: The Act is intended for survey of Government lands and estates as defined therein, not for resolving boundary disputes between private individuals over patta lands. The provisions of Sections 5, 9, and 14 read with the scheme of the Act make it clear that survey officers cannot determine civil rights. Such disputes must be adjudicated by a competent civil court. Additionally, suppression of the dismissal of earlier civil proceedings by the writ petitioner disentitles him to equitable relief. Result : Writ appeal allowed; order dated 15.11.2024 in W.P.No.34236 of 2024 set aside. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed. (Para 7)}}

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • property law
    • boundary disputes
      • survey of land (Para 5)
      • tamil nadu survey and boundaries act, 1923 (Para 5)
  • practice and procedure
    • writ jurisdiction
      • maintainability of writ petition for survey (Para 4, 7)
    • civil procedure
      • jurisdiction of civil court
        • exclusive jurisdiction over boundary disputes (Para 5)

Table of Contents

1. Writ appeal challenging order directing survey of private property under the Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923. (Para 4 )

2. Writ order set aside; writ appeal allowed; no order as to costs. (Para 7 )

3. Is an application for survey under the Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 maintainable for private patta lands?

No, the Act applies only to government lands and estates; private boundary disputes must be resolved by civil court. (Para 5 )

4. Can a survey officer determine a disputed boundary under the Act?

No, the survey officer can only record undisputed boundaries; disputed boundaries require civil court adjudication. (Para 5 )

5. Are survey records conclusive proof of title or civil rights?

No, survey records are not conclusive proof; civil rights must be established through civil court. (Para 5 )

6. What is the scope of Section 5 of the Act?

Section 5 empowers survey of government lands and boundaries between government and private lands, not private land boundaries. (Para 5 )

JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)

Present writ appeal has been instituted challenging the writ order dated 15.11.2024 in W.P.No.34236 of 2024.

2. The appellants are third parties and they have filed the present intra-court appeal by securing leave from this Court on the ground that a civil suit in O.S.No.135 of 2020 filed by the first respondent was dismissed and the appeal suit in A.S.No.20 of 2021 was also dismissed. Both in the suit and appeal suit, appellants are parties and by suppressing the said fact, the first respondent secured orders from the writ Court to survey subject property.

3. Learned counsel for the first respondent has not disputed the above facts regarding institution of the suit, appeal suit and dismissal of the same.

4. The writ Court has proceeded on the basis that an application has been filed to survey and fix boundaries in respect of subject property described in the writ proceedings. Writ Court has issued directions to consider the application and complete the exercise of conducting survey of the subject land within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.

5. The application submitted seeking conduct of survey and to fix the boundaries is not entertainable under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 (Tamil Nadu Act No.VIII of 1923). The principles in this regard are elaborately considered by this Court in the case of T.Gothai vs. District Collector (W.A.No.2304 of 2024 dtaed 06.10.2025). Relevant portion of the order reads as under:

'6. Let us consider the scope and application of the Act 1923. Chapter II deals with “The survey of Government lands”. Chapter III deals with “The survey of estates”. Applications are filed by the private individuals to conduct survey of patta lands under Section 5 of Chapter II of the Act. When Chapter II deals with the survey to be conducted in respect of the Government lands, it would be relevant to consider the scope of Section 5 for conducting survey of patta lands or to resolve the boundary dispute between private individuals in respect of patta lands. Section 5 of the Act reads as under:

5. The State Government or subject to the control of the State Government any officer or authority to whom this power may be delegated by it may by notification order a survey of any Government land or of any boundary of such land or of the boundary forming the common limit of Government land and land that is not Government land.

7. Section 6 denotes notification to be published by Survey Officer. Section 7 states that the Survey Officer has to carry out survey in prescribed manner. Section 8 is about the cost to be charged from the persons interested in the land survey. Section 9 provides power of the Survey Officer to determine and record un-disputed boundaries. Section 9 (1) indicates that the Survey Officer shall have power to determine and record undisputed boundary in respect of which no dispute is brought to his notice. Section 10(1) denotes that “where a boundary is disputed, the survey officer, after making such inquiry as he considers necessary, shall determine the boundary and record in accordance with his decision. The Survey Officer shall record in writing the reasons for his decision”.

8. Section 14 stipulates “Any person deeming himself aggrieved by the determination of any boundary under Section 9 , 10 or 11 may subject to the provisions of Parts II and III of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 (Central Act 36 of 1963), institute a suit within three years from the date of the notification under Section 13 to set aside or modify the said determination and the survey shall, if necessary, be altered in accordance with the final decree in the suit and the alteration, if any, shall be noted in the record”. The very scheme of the Act unambiguously amplifies that the final arbitrator is the Civil Court of law and the surveyor cannot entertain any dispute between the parties regarding

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top