Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SHAMIM AHMED, J
Natarajan, S/o Paramasivam – Appellant
Versus
Thennarasu, S/o. Senthamarai – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction under section 138 affirmed. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. court's observation on evidence and presumption. (Para 4 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. arguments on evidential insufficiency raised. (Para 5 , 6) |
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED Crl.RC(MD).No.1248 of 2025 Crl.MP(MD)Nos.12153 and 12154 of 2025
1. Natarajan, S/o Paramasivam, 1/48C, High School Road, Villathikulam, Kovilpatti Taluk, Thoothukudi District
2. Natarajan, Proprietor, Sakthi Murugan Transport, 9, Kesavankundru Road, Karisalkulam Village Thoothukudi District Revision Petitioners Vs Thennarasu, S/o. Senthamarai, 36, Valampuri Vinayagar Koil Street, Sivagiri, Tirunelveli District Respondent Prayer:- This Criminal Revision Case has been filed, under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (businesses), to call for the records, relating to the Judgement of conviction and sentence and order, dated 22.11.2022, passed in CA.No.113 of 2018, by the Principal District and Sessions Court, at Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District, confirming the judgement of conviction and sentence and order, dated 29.08.2018, passed in CC.No.38 of2016, by the Judicial Magistrate Court, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar D
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
