Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. Jothiraman, N. Sathish Kumar, JJ
Sarvanan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case leading to the conviction. (Para 2) |
| 2. appellant's arguments against the conviction. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's overview of evidence and witness statements. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. ratio decidendi regarding parental responsibilities. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. final decision and implications of the judgment. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT
M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.
The sole accused in Crime No.9/2016 on the file of the respondent herein is the appellant herein. This Criminal Appeal has been filed challenging the judgment of conviction and sentenced dated 12.02.2019 in Spl.SC.No.64 of 2016 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Needhimandram, Salem, in and by which the appellant was convicted under sections 4 and 10 of The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [ in short “POCSO Act”] and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo 6 months simple imprisonment for the offence under Section 4 of POCSO Act and sentenced to undergo 7 years imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo 6 months simple imprisonment for the offence under Section 10 of the POCSO Act.
2. Facts le
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
