Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.POORNIMA, J
M/s.United India Insurance Company Limited, Represented by its Branch Manager – Appellant
Versus
Babu Antony Raj – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case facts and claimant's injuries detailed; liability contested. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. issues of liability and negligence raised regarding the driver's conduct. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court discusses evidentiary standards regarding license validity and ownership. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. final ruling upholding tribunal's decision on compensation. (Para 17 , 18) |
4.Mr.Nallasivam Pillai : Respondents 2 to 4/R1, R2 &R4 PRAYER:-Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 , against the judgment and decree, dated 17/02/2012 made in MCOP No.13 of 2007 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Sub Court), Padmanabhapuram.
For Appellant : Mr.D.Rajesh Saravanan For 1st Respondent : Mr.F.Deepak (No appearance)
For R2 and R4 : No appearance For 3rd Respondent : Mr.S.Jeyakumar
J U D G M E N T
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree, dated 17/02/2012 made in MCOP No.13 of 2007 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Sub Court), Padmanabhapuram.
2.The brief case of the claimant are as follows:-
(i) On 05/06/2006 at about 08.30 am, the petitioner was returning from Thozhicode after
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
