SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65187

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
Chandrasekaran – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Educational Officer – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mr.S.Sukumar
For the Respondents: Mr.S.Shaji Bino

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned proceedings dated 03.12.2021, issued by the second respondent and the consequential proceedings dated 19.01.2022, issued by the third respondent, seeking to recover the alleged excess payments made to the petitioner in the form of incentive increment in the year 2011.

2. The petitioner was awarded incentive increment for acquiring higher educational qualification on 10.11.2011. However, the respondents, based on the audit objections, have issued the impugned proceedings, on the ground that the incentive increment awarded to the petitioner was erroneous and incorrect. Admittedly, more than five years have elapsed from the date when the petitioner was awarded incentive increment in the year 2011 till the date of passing of the impugned proceedings, which are dated 03.12.2021 and

19.01.2022.

3. The law is now well settled by the decision rendered by the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab and others vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer) and others, reported in (2015) 4 SCC 334 wherein, it has been held that recovery from the employees, when the excess payment has been made for a period in excess of five yea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top