SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65191

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
ARUMUGAVADIVU.R – Appellant
Versus
THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY E – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.T.Chandrasekaran
For the Respondents: Mr.S.Shaji Bino, Mr.S.Sathya Chidambaram

O R D E R

This matter is listed today under the caption “for dismissal” today.

2. As seen from the earlier proceedings, this matter has been listed before me on three occasions and it is the fourth time this matter is listed before me. As seen from the earlier proceedings, repeated adjournments have been sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioner to argue the matter. This writ petition is of the year 2022. No further adjournment can be granted. It can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition.

3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

13.11.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No krk To:

1.The Director of Elementary Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-600 006.

2.The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

3.The District Educational Officer, Seranmahadevi Educational District, Tirunelveli District.

4.The Block Educational Officer Seranmahadevi Union Tirunelveli District ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

krk and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.176 & 177 of 2022

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top