SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65192

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
S.Arivazhagan – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary Government of Tamilnadu Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: No appearance
For the Respondents:Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate

O R D E R

There is no representation on the side of the petitioner.

2. It is also brought to the notice of this Court by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents that the petitioner died on 15.02.2025. He has also placed on record the death certificate of the petitioner, which confirms that the petitioner died on 15.02.2025.

3. However, till date the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner have also not been substituted by filing a substitution petition. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed as abated. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top