Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
M.Jeeva Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations against public sector employees must undergo proper inquiry. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. rights to appeal must be facilitated and observed. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. final order directs adherence to natural justice in the cancellation of disciplinary actions. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 15.09.2020, passed by the first respondent, imposing the punishment of stoppage of increment for a period of one year without cumulative effect on the petitioner.
2. The petitioner claims that he is an innocent. According to the petitioner, the charges framed against him in the disciplinary proceedings are false. The petitioner claims that without any basis, the respondents have framed charges against him as if there were less number of passengers in the bus, when he was on duty as driver. The petitioner is a driver in the respondent – Transport Corporation. The petitioner also claims that there was no proper enquiry held by the respondents before imposing the punishment of stoppage of increment for a period of one year without cumulative effect. He claims that there were many passengers in the bus. But, vindictively, in order to pun
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
