Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J
Krishnasamy (Died) – Appellant
Versus
Narayanasamy (Deceased) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. brief facts regarding the suit and parties involved. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides on the sufficiency of evidence. (Para 11) |
| 3. discussion on the execution of the reconveyance agreement. (Para 12 , 17) |
| 4. final determination based on insufficient evidence of execution. (Para 18) |
| 5. concluding verdict of dismissal. (Para 19) |
JUDGMENT
The legal heirs of the original plaintiff in O.S.No.273 of 1990 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Periyakulam, have filed this appeal challenging the dismissal of the suit in O.S.No.273 of 1990 by the impugned judgment dated 21.10.2013.
2. For the sake of convenience and brevity, the parties herein after will be referred to as per their status/ranking before the trial Court.
3. The brief averments made in the plaint are as follows:-
The suit scheduled property belonged to one S.R.V.Moogaiya.
S.R.V.Moogaiya executed a sale deed dated 17.02.1980 in favour of the first defendant for sale consideration of Rs.49,000/-. S.R.V.Moogaiya entered into reconveyance agreement with the first defendant on the same day itself on condition that the first defendant should receive the amount of Rs.49,000/- from the said S.R.V.Moogaiya
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
