Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 78198

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
J.Fazul Ahamed – Appellant
Versus
Pandi, The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai – Respondent
Cont.P.(MD)No. 2912 of 2025 in W.P.(MD) No.15753 of 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. H.Arumugam
For the Respondents:Mr.M.Muthumanikkam Government Advocate

Court allows contempt petition to be closed while permitting appellant to challenge subsequent order legally.

Headnote:This contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 seeks to punish respondents for willful disobedience of the court's order dated 11.06.2025 in W.P.(MD) No.15753 of 2025. The petitioner claims that the order has not been complied with. The court notes the presentation of an order dated 11.11.2025 and concludes this contempt petition while allowing the petitioner to challenge the new order in accordance with law. The final decision is to close the contempt petition with the liberty granted to the petitioner.

Table of Content
1. court reviews contempt petition based on compliance with prior orders (Para 1)
2. petitioner granted liberty to legally challenge new order (Para 2)

O R D E R

The learned Government Advocate has submitted an order dated

11.11.2025 along with annexure thereto. In view thereof, this Contempt Petition is closed by leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge such order in accordance with law.

12.11.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd To

1. The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai.

2.The Special District Revenue Officer, Land Acquisition, Highways Department, Madurai.

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY , J.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 78198

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASSenthilkumar Ramamoorthy, JJ.Fazul Ahamed – AppellantVersusPandi, The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai – RespondentCont.P.(MD)No. 2912 of 2025 in W.P.(MD) No.15753 of 2025

Court allows contempt petition to be closed while permitting appellant to challenge subsequent order legally.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
J.Fazul Ahamed – Appellant
Versus
Pandi, The Tahsildar, Madurai North Taluk, Madurai – Respondent
Cont.P.(MD)No. 2912 of 2025 in W.P.(MD) No.15753 of 2025