Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65212

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
Ganesan – Appellant
Versus
Sangeetha – Respondent
Cont.P.(MD) No. 3143 of 2025 in W.P.(MD) No. 10533 of 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. E.Mohammed Abbas
For the Respondents: Mr.K.R.Badurus Zaman

Compliance with court orders leads to dismissal of contempt petitions.

Headnote:The case involves a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 regarding disobedience of a court order dated 17.04.2025. The petitioner asserts non-compliance but both parties state the order has been complied with, leading to the closure of the petition. The court, by noting compliance, effectively dismisses the contempt petition.

O R D E R

Both learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate state in unison that the order has been complied with. Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65212

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASSenthilkumar Ramamoorthy, JGanesan – AppellantVersusSangeetha – RespondentCont.P.(MD) No. 3143 of 2025 in W.P.(MD) No. 10533 of 2025

Compliance with court orders leads to dismissal of contempt petitions.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
Ganesan – Appellant
Versus
Sangeetha – Respondent
Cont.P.(MD) No. 3143 of 2025 in W.P.(MD) No. 10533 of 2025