IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
Ranganathan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This Criminal Appeal has been filed by the appellant/accused seeking to set aside the Order dated 14.10.2025 in C.M.P.No.120 of 2025 in Crime No.274 of 2025 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of Cases under SC/ST (POA) Act, Tiruppur and to enlarge him on bail in Crime No.274 of 2025 on the file of 2nd respondent Police.
2. The case of the prosecution is that 3rd respondent/de-facto complainant had preferred a complaint to the respondent Police alleging that appellant/accused used a filthy language about the caste of 3rd respondent/de-facto complainant and slapped the 3rd respondent/de-facto complainant in front of his wife and also, threatened the family members of
3rd respondent/de-facto complainant for involving the 3rd respondent/de- facto complainant in the political activities in the surrounding region. Based on the complaint given by 3rd respondent/de-facto complainant, respondent Police had registered a case in Crime No.274 of 2025 against the appellant/accused.
3. The learned counsel for appellant/accused submitted that 3rd respondent/de-facto complainant was working as a labourer in the house of appellant/accused. The 3rd respondent/de-fact
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.