Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
Ranganathan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the appeal and allegations raised. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments of the appellant regarding false complaint. (Para 3 , 4 , 8) |
| 3. court's observation and review of detention. (Para 6) |
| 4. court's decision to grant bail. (Para 10) |
| 5. final order and conditions for bail. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT
This Criminal Appeal has been filed by the appellant/accused seeking to set aside the Order dated 14.10.2025 in C.M.P.No.120 of 2025 in Crime No.274 of 2025 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of Cases under SC/ST (POA) Act, Tiruppur and to enlarge him on bail in Crime No.274 of 2025 on the file of 2nd respondent Police.
2. The case of the prosecution is that 3rd respondent/de-facto complainant had preferred a complaint to the respondent Police alleging that appellant/accused used a filthy language about the caste of 3rd respondent/de-facto complainant and slapped the 3rd respondent/de-facto complainant in front of his wife and also, threatened the family members of
3rd respondent/de-facto complainant for involving the 3rd respondent/de- facto complainant in the political activities in the surrounding region. Based on the complaint given by 3rd respondent/d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
