Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SUNDER MOHAN, J
R.Sanjay – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, VK Puram, Police Station, Tirunelveli District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegation relates to an attack due to prior enmity. (Para 2) |
| 2. parties have reached a compromise and wish to withdraw proceedings. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. the court quashed the final report based on the compromise. (Para 5) |
ORDER
The petitioner seeks for quashing of the impugned final report in C.C.No.30 of 2025 on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Ambasamudram, for the offences under Sections 296 (b), 351(3) and 131 of B NS , 2023.
2. The gist of the allegation is that on account of prior enmity, the petitioner had attacked the defacto complainant in a TASMAC shop with hands and stones and thus, committed the aforesaid offences.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the defacto complainant / the second respondent would submit that the petitioner and the defacto complainant are closely related to each other and that the parties have arrived at a compromise and have signed a memo of compromise and both the parties have agreed that the impugned F.I.R may be quashed.
4. The parties have also filed a joint compromise memo dated 28th October 2025. The petitioner and the second respondent/ defacto complainant are present before this Court in person.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
