SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65218

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SUNDER MOHAN, J
Sathiyaselvi – Appellant
Versus
Thiyagarajan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Vijaya Ragavan

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.O.P.(MD).No.19944 of 2025 Sathiyaselvi ... Petitioner Vs.

Thiyagarajan ... Respondent Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to set aside the condition imposed in paragraph No.6(2) with regard to the time limit and extend the time limit to deposit the amount, as per the condition imposed by the learned III Additional District and Session Judge, Thiruchirappalli in Crl.M.P.No.1806 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.46 of 2025 by an order dated 10.07.2025.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vijaya Ragavan

ORDER

The petitioner seeks to set aside the condition imposed in paragraph No.

6(2) in Crl.M.P.No.1806 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.46 of 2025 by the learned III Additional District and Session Judge, Thiruchirappalli, by an order, dated

10.07.2025.

2. The petitioner, who was an accused in a case in S.T.C.No.6089 of 2019 filed for the offence under Section 138 r/w. 142 of Negotiable Instrument Act , 1881, was convicted and sentenced to undergo six months Simple Imprisonment and further directed to pay a compensation of Rs.4,00,000/-, aggrieved over the same, he filed an appeal b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top