SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65240

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.Sathish Kumar, M.Jothiraman, JJ
J.Dhanalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
The Chairman Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry – Respondent
W.P.No.42377 of 2025 | WMP.No.47349 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.A.M.O.Gurunarayana Rao
For the Respondents: Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar, Mr.S.R.Raghunathan

The court confirmed that a writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn based on the petitioner's request.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The Writ filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays for a Writ of Mandamus for issuing identity cards to the petitioner. Facts of the Case: The petitioner sought permanent issuance of identity cards to its members.

Findings of Court:
The Court reviewed the petition and noted the petitioner's desire to withdraw the writ petition.

Issues: The primary question framed was regarding the validity and duration of the identity cards for members.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the petitioner opted to withdraw the application and hence the case was dismissed as withdrawn.

Result: This petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Table of Content
1. writ for identity cards (Para 1)
2. withdrawal of petition (Para 3)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 12.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W.P.No.42377 of 2025 & WMP.No.47349 of 2025 J.Dhanalakshmi ... Petitioner Versus

1.The Chairman Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry Madras High Court Campus Chennai – 600 104

2. The Chairman Bar Council of India

21, Rouse Avenue, Institutional Area New Delhi – 110 002 .. Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to issue identity cards to the petitioner its member without any date of expiry and to treat the identity cards already in the hands of the members in existence be held valid permanently as long as they continue to be the members of the first respondent.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.M.O.Gurunarayana Rao For Respondents : Mr.C.K.Chandrasekar for R1 Standing Counsel Mr.S.R.Raghunathan for R2 Standing Counsel O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)

This writ petition has been filed directing the Bar Council to issue identity cards to the petitioner its member without any date of expiry and to treat the identity cards already in the hands of the members in existence be held valid permanently as long as they continue to be the members of the first respondent.

2. When the Court was about to dismiss the writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this petition.

He also made an endorsement in the case bundle to that effect.

3. Such view of the matter, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top