SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65255

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
G.Gajendran – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.P.Gunasekaran for Mr.V.Kannan
For the Respondents: Mr.A.Baskaran Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

This matter is listed today under the caption “for dismissal”.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is once again not ready.

2. As seen from the earlier proceedings, learned counsel for the petitioner has been repeatedly seeking adjournments. Even on the last hearing date i.e., on 23.10.2025, when the matter appeared before me, only on the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this matter was adjourned today and accordingly, this matter is listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. This writ petition is of the year year 2021. It can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition.

3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

No costs.

12.11.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No krk To:

1.The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts, Nandanam, Anna Salai, Chennai-35.

2.The Additional Director (Admin)

of Treasuries and Accounts, Chennai-35.

3.The Treasury Officer, District Treasury, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top