SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J
P.Kala – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr.S.Bharathy Kannan
For the Respondents:Mr.M.Muthumanikkam, Government Advocate

ORDER

By asserting that the petitioner and her family have been residing in new Plot No.45/11C2, which falls in S.No.46/1, the petitioner had applied for patta in relation thereto. The present writ petition has been filed on the ground that such application was not acted upon.

2. Learned Government Advocate accepts notice for all the respondents.

On the basis of written instructions, he submits that the land is classified as natham poromboke varathukalum. Since it is classified as a water body, he submits that it may not be possible to grant patta to the petitioner. Without prejudice, he states that orders would be issued on merits.

3. Accordingly, without making any observations on the merits, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the 3rd respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's request for patta on merits within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top