IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
M.Balakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts Integrated Finance Department – Respondent
O R D E R
This writ petition is listed today under the caption “for dismissal”.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner reports no instruction. This matter was listed before me on 19.09.2025 and 17.10.2025 earlier. On both occasions, learned counsel for the petitioner sought further time to argue the matter. Since this writ petition is of the year 2021, this Court had directed the Registry to list the matter under the caption “for dismissal”. Accordingly, this matter is listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is unable to contact the petitioner. Since this writ petition is of the year 2021, no further adjournment can be granted. It can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition.
3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.