IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Anita Sumanth, C.Kumarappan, JJ
M.Backialakshmi – Appellant
Versus
T.Raja Usha Rani – Respondent
(Order of the Court was made by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.)
The present petition seeking grant of leave to challenge the orders dated 13.08.2025 and 20.08.2025 is unnecessary, as the Commissioner, Sivakasi Municipal Corporation / R2 in writ petition had challenged orders dated 13.08.2025 and 20.08.2025 in WA(MD)No.2838 of 2025 and that writ appeal had come to be allowed by order dated
13.10.2025. The operative portion of the order is as follows:-
'11. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of the various orders passed by both the Division Bench and the learned Single Judge of this Court in successive rounds of litigation, we are of the firm view that, once the writ petition was dismissed on 03.02.2025, followed by the dismissal of the writ appeal on 11.08.2025, the petition filed by the first respondent thereafter, seeking to re- agitate the same issue under the guise of a writ of mandamus to compel consideration of her appeal against the order dated 08.01.2025 was not maintainable.
12. It appears that, aggrieved by the order dated
08.01.2025, the first respondent not only filed an appeal, but also preferred a writ petition before this Court seeking enforcement of her
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.