Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65286

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SOUNTHAR, J
P.R.Mukundan – Appellant
Versus
Mr.Gopi – Respondent
Cont.P.Nos.1373, 1374 and 1375 of 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.L.Chandrakumar
For the Respondent: Mr.M.Suresh Kumar, Mr.Ramesh Venkatachalapathy, Mr.R.Murthi

Court acknowledges compliance with prior orders in contempt proceedings.

Headnote:The contempt petitions were filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, claiming wilful disobedience of court orders from W.P.Nos.28741, 28743 and 28738 of 2024. The petitioners' counsel indicated compliance with the court order. The court then acknowledged this compliance and concluded the petitions.

C O M M O N O R D E R

When these contempt petitions are taken for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the order under contempt has been complied with.

2. Recording the same, the contempt petitions are closed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document