SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65290

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J
S.K.Elumalai – Appellant
Versus
K.Madhu Srinivas – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mr.C.Rishi for Mr.R.Balachandran
For the Respondent: Ms.M.Sumi Arnica Legal Aid Counsel

ORDER

Today, the matter is listed under the caption “For Being Mentioned” at the instance of the learned Counsel for the appellant.

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

rsi

2.The learned Counsel for the appellant submits that though this Court dismissed the appeal on 07.10.2025, the exact disposal of the case not mentioned in the order. Hence, seeks clarification.

3.On perusal of the order it is seen that the result portion of the order has not been mentioned. Hence, the last line of paragraph No.5 substituted to read as under:

“5. ..... Hence this Court finds no reason to interfere with the findings of the Trial Court and the Criminal Appeal stands dismissed.”

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top