SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Shamim Ahmed, J
Mohammed Ali Hoothu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Sureshkumar
For the Respondents:Mr.M.Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.side)

O R D E R

The present Criminal Revision Case has been filed with the following prayer:

“to call for the records from the learned Trial Court and to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.15 of 2025 in S.C.No.16 of 2024, dated 12.08.2025 on the file of learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Eraniel by allowing this Revision”

2.Mr.S.Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioner submits that he do not want to press this Criminal Revision Case on the instructions of his client and that he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Revision Case. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

3.Mr.M.Karunanithi, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent has no objection to the prayer made by the learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioner.

4.Accordingly, in view of the submission of the learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, granted stands vacated and the file is consigned to record. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top