SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65297

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B. Balaji, J
S.K.Kalidass Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
A.Sivapandian – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.G.Sugumaran
For the Respondents: Mr.T.Gandhi

COMMON ORDER

The parties were referred to Mediation Centre, attached to this Court, in and by which under a Settlement Agreement dated 29.10.2025, the parties have amicably resolved the differences.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent has vacated and handed over vacant possession.

3. Recording the said submission, both the civil revision petitions are disposed of. The Settlement Agreement dated 29.10.2025 shall form part of this order. No costs.

11.11.2025 Index:yes/no Website:yes/no Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order sr To

1.The IX Court of Small Causes, Chennai

2. The XVI Court of Small Causes, Chennai P.B.BALAJI.,J sr CRP Nos1609 and 2293 of 2023

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top