SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 65298

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. Sounthar, J
Priyanka – Appellant
Versus
Vinothkumar – Respondent
CRP No.5501 of 2025|HMOP.SR.No.872 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.Marudhachalamurthy

Parties seeking divorce under mutual consent can seek exemption from the cooling-off period under Section 14, which must be considered by the court.

Headnote:This Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 challenges the order of return dated 10.10.2025 in HMOP SR No.872 of 2025. The petitioner and respondent filed for mutual consent divorce under Section 13

(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act but faced issues regarding the one-year cooling period, prompting a Section 14 exemption request. The Court found the lower court erroneously returned the application without addressing the exemption request. The ruling emphasizes that issues of merits should be considered rather than technicalities. The court set aside the impugned order and re-directed the parties to pursue their application with due legal opportunity.

Table of Content
1. proper procedure for applying mutual consent divorce. (Para 2 , 3)
2. court's duty to consider merits of exemption petitions. (Para 4 , 5)
3. final order to set aside the return and reinstate application. (Para 6)

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order of return passed by the Court below, dated 10.10.2025 in HMOP SR No.872 of 2025..

2. The petitioner and the respondent filed an application for dissolution of marriage that had taken place on 03.03.2025 between them, under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act. Since the cooling period of one year was not completed, on the date of presentation of the said HMOP, the petitioner also filed an application under Section 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking exemption, along with the HMOP.

3. The Court below, returned the HMOP SR No.872 of 2025, mainly on the ground that cooling period of one year was not over on the date of presentation of OP. The petitioner and the respondent re-presented the said OP papers stating that the marriage between both the parties irretrievable broken down and there was no possibility of reunion and hence, the OP was filed seeking divorce on mutual consent. The court below, without considering the exemption petition filed by the parties along with the OP, again returned the OP papers. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has come before this court.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that when the application has been filed by the parties seeking exemption under Section 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act, the court below should have numbered the HMOP and considered the averment made by the parties on its own merits, instead of returning the papers.

5. A perusal of the typed set of papers would indicate that the parties, conscious of the fact that filing of HMOP seeking divorce on mutual consent was presented within the cooling period of one year. They filed necessary application under Section 14 of Hindu Marriage Act seeking leave of the court to present the petition under Section 13(b) of Hindu Marriage Act, within one year. The Court below, without considering the petition filed by the parties under Section 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act on merits, erroneously returned the papers on the ground that the main OP was filed within the cooling period of one year. Therefore, this court is inclined to interfere with the impugned order of return passed by the court below.

6. Accordingly, the impugned order of return passed by the court below dated 10.10.2025 is set aside. The parties are directed to re-present the returned papers before the concerned court, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. The Court below shall number the application filed by the parties under Section 14 of Hindu Marriage Act, if it is otherwise in order and dispose of the same in accordance with law, after giving sufficient opportunity to the parties.

7. With the above direction, this civil revision petition is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. The Registry is directed to return the original returned papers in Filing No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top