Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.Senthilkumar, J
Marico Limited – Appellant
Versus
Prahalad Rai Kedia Proprietor, Kedia Industries – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the petition and grounds for copyright infringement. (Para 2) |
| 2. analysis of the parties' claims and court's evaluation of evidence. (Para 3 , 5 , 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's conclusion on the dismissal of the petition. (Para 8 , 9 , 12) |
PRAYER Petition filed under Section 50 of the Copyright Act, 1957 , (a) to suspend the impugned copyright registration No.A-85790/2009 of the Respondent from the Copyright Register during the pendency of the present proceedings; (b) to expunge the impugned copyright registration No.A-85790/2009 of the Respondent from the Copyright Register and (c) cost of present proceedings may be awarded to the petitioner.
For Petitioner (s): Mr.Rupikaa Srinivasan for Mr.Shikha Sachdev For Respondent(s): Mr.Subbu Rangha Bharathi (for R2)
R1 - Set exparte
ORDER
The present petition has been filed (a) to suspend the impugned copyright registration No.A-85790/2009 of the 1st Respondent from the Copyright Register during the pendency of the present proceedings and (b) to expunge the impugned copyright registration No.A-85790/2009 of the 1st Respondent from the Copyright Register.
2.The brief case of the petitioner is as follows:
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
