Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Shamim Ahmed, J
J.Gifta Ani Ranjani – Appellant
Versus
Jebastin Raj – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's reliance on financial hardship and distance for case transfer. (Para 2) |
| 2. court found insufficient justification for transfer without representation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. final ruling to dismiss the transfer petition. (Para 6) |
O R D E R
The present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed with the following prayer:
“to withdraw the case pending on the file of the Family Court, Thoothukudi, in D.O.P.No.117 of 2023 and transfer the same to the District Family Court, Tirunelveli.”
2.The facts of the case, in a nutshell, led to filing of this Petition and necessary for disposal of same, are as follows:-
a)The Petitioner is the wife and the Respondent is the husband and their marriage was solemnized on 09.09.2022, according to Christian customs and rituals and out of their wedlock, they blessed with a baby boy, who is about two years old. Due to matrimonial dispute arose between them, the Petitioner had left the matrimonial home. The Respondent/Husband had filed the above case in D.O.P.No.117 of 2023, before the Family Court, Thoothukudi, against the Petitioner/Wife, for divorce on the ground of desertion and dereliction of duty as wife. But, accordi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
