Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Anita Sumanth, C.Kumarappan, JJ
The Managing Director, State Express Transport Corporation (Tamil Nadu) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
C.Baluchamy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the writ appeal and delay (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's observations on delay justification (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. appellants' arguments for condoning delay (Para 5 , 8) |
| 4. judicial scrutiny of administrative delay (Para 9 , 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. court's emphasis on limitation laws (Para 11 , 13) |
| 6. dismissal of the writ appeal (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT
(Order of the Court was made by C.KUMARAPPAN, J.)
The present writ appeal has been filed against the order of the learned single Judge in W.M.P(MD)No.6517 of 2025, dated 20.08.2025 by and in which, the learned single Judge has dismissed the delay condonation application filed along with the unnumbered Review Application.
2.The facts in so far as material and relating to the controversies are as follows; the respondent herein has preferred a writ petition in W.P.(MD)No.265 of 2024 claiming Selection Grade Pay. The learned single Judge, vide order dated 06.03.2024, has allowed the writ petition. Aggrieved with the same, the appellants herein has preferred the writ appeal in W.A(MD)No.1197 of 2024, but later on they withdrew the same on 23.07.2024, and as a result of which, the same was dismissed as withdrawn. After withdrawal of th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
