Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Anand Venkatesh, J
Abrarul Huq.S.M. – Appellant
Versus
The Controller Of Examination / Appellate Authority The Tamilnadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for examination materials under writ of mandamus. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. legal representation and presentation of arguments. (Para 2) |
| 3. judicial observations on procedural compliance. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 4. court's directive to provide answer sheets. (Para 7) |
| 5. conclusion of the writ petition. (Para 8) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed for the issue of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to furnish the photocopies of the answer sheets of the subjects in (TA1A – English, TA1C – Law of Contract 1, TA4B – Administrative Law) and answer keys for the subjects ( TA1A - English, TA1C Law of Contract 1, TA4B – Administrative Law) in the examinations held on November 2024 and May 2025.
2. Heard Mr.I.Abrar Mohamed Abdullah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Siva Shanmugam, learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2.
3. When the matter came up for hearing on 06.11.2025, this Court directed the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the University to take instructions. Accordingly, the matter was listed for hearing today.
4. A counter affidavit has been filed by the Registrar of the University. It is stated that a Window period is given for the purpose of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
